Demon-infiltrated priests. Vampires with a hunger
for a Type O chaser. Haunted objects with deadly histories. Creepy
houses that possess something scarier than a subprime mortgage.
Yeah, yeah – been there, done that, right? Well, not in the
cinema of John Orrichio. The New Jersey-based filmmaker has turned
out a nifty series of horror/chillers that bring new imagination and
style to the ghouls-and-gals world of low-budget scream flicks.
In the past three years, Orrichio provided audiences with “The
Possession of Father Thomas” (2004), “Requiem for a Vampire” (2006)
and “The Haunting of Danbury House” (2007). Although shot on the
proverbial shoestring budget and distributed straight-to-video,
Orrichio’s features infuse new blood (pardon the pun) into the
genre. Through unconventional casting, innovative tinkering with
long-standing horror traditions and the joyful energy unique to
guerrilla-style filmmaking, Orrichio could easily lay claim to the
title of a new Roger Corman.
His latest offering, “Black Ribbon,” is in post-production. It is
also his first time working with a “name” star – in this case, TV
talk show legend Joe Franklin, who takes on a rare acting role.
Film Threat caught up with Orrichio at his studio to talk about
his adventures in the horror genre.
What inspired you to get involved in the low-budget
horror movie industry?
Being a fan of the horror genre,
I’ve seen just about every horror and thriller movie made. I’m also
an avid reader, devouring eight to 12 books a month mostly thriller
and suspense. Most of the lower budget movies produced today are
really bad! Poor acting, terrible music and awful story lines. After
watching these, I knew I could do better. I’m trying to bring my
movies up from “B” movie status to an “A” level on a limited budget.
It’s very difficult at times, but I believe with each movie I make,
I’m getting closer to that goal.
You wear many hats in your films
(director-producer-writer-editor-cinematographer). Is this by design
or default?
It’s by design. When I finish writing a
story, I have in my mind how it will look. I can visualize the
settings, the way each character looks and speaks and the tone of
each scene.
Being the editor also helps. I shoot with editing in mind. I know
when I need a cut away, different angle, close up etc. I don’t know
how other directors entrust their work to someone who has no idea
how the story should flow. The hardest part was learning the editing
systems. I started on Final Cut Pro, went to Adobe Premier Pro and
ended up working on the Avid System because I believe it’s the best
out there. Each system, although somewhat similar, has its own
learning curve, the Avid being the most difficult.
I’m shooting everything on digital cameras by Panasonic. My last
two movies also include full orchestra soundtracks that I arranged
to fit each scene.
Your first film as director, "The Possession of Father
Thomas," covers the territory of good-versus-evil within a
theological setting. How did you determine to make this film stand
out from other horror films that incorporate religion into their
plots?
“Father Thomas” was my first movie and I did want
it to be different in a few ways. First, the actor playing Father
Thomas was not a person normally seen in most horror movies. He
wasn’t leading man quality: he was around 375 pounds and he was
likeable. He became the pawn of the spirit of an evil priest that
once live at the rectory. It was a story about the struggle of good
and evil within Father Thomas. As the movie went on, Father Thomas
seemed to get larger and larger both in appearance and by what he
was doing. It was more a movie about his losing faith in God and
being uncomfortable being assigned a new parish. In the end, he lost
and everyone died!
Your next film, "Requiem for a Vampire," also covers a
familiar subject matter with vampirism. Why do you believe that
people are still in love with vampire movies?
Vampires
will always be in vogue. Look at the success of Anne Rice’s “Vampire
Chronicles,” only today the vampires are stunning! The male vampire
is handsome and the female vampire is beautiful. They live forever,
have supernatural powers and are extremely wealthy, who wouldn’t
want to be one?
In “Requiem for a Vampire,” my female vampire dies of natural
causes. That’s unheard of, and the family struggles for advice from
so called vampire experts on the proper funeral service and what has
tainted the blood that they consumed! It’s a story about how a
modern family of vampires cope living in the 21st century. It also
shows the love they have for each other and their human
counterparts. It has a great soundtrack from a band in Germany and a
surprise ending.
You co-directed "The Haunting of Danbury House" with Karl
Petry. Is it easier to collaborate with a co-director or to work on
your own?
I find it easier to work on my own. Karl and I
are good friends. We both had ideas how the movie was to be brought
to life. I’m more on the edge and wanted to push the envelope. Karl
is more conservative and wanted to stick to more factual scenarios.
The movie ended up being very good as we compromised. I wouldn’t
recommend co-directing unless you both have the same vision. Working
on my own I’m able to let my imagination go wild.
Tell us about your new project, "Black Ribbon." And how
did Joe Franklin get into this movie?
“Black Ribbon” was
a screenplay I’d just finished. I decided to make the movie by
myself. It’s by far the most exciting, bizarre film I’ve done to
date. It’s my imagination in overdrive. “Black Ribbon” is about a
famous writer who buys a haunted typewriter on the Internet. He
slowly turns into the person who once owned it. It’s a story about a
normal person thrown into the paranormal. He doesn’t know what’s
real, what’s fantasy and we don’t know if it’s him, the town or
what’s responsible for the strange happenings.
Tony Rugnetta, who plays the lead role in “Black Ribbon,” showed
Joe Franklin “Danbury House.” Joe was very impressed with the
quality of the film especially the story and acting. He said he
would like to be part of the next project. Tony contacted him and we
discussed it. We recently finished shooting Joe’s part and he’s
looking to help promote the movie. This is the only film, I believe,
that Joe plays a different role. He usually appears in films as
himself. In this movie Joe plays the part of the main character’s
father. He did a great job and it was a surreal experience working
with someone I grew up watching on TV. It was a very exciting once
in a lifetime opportunity.